December 31, 2023
I'm feeling like the most important thing we can do right now is pay attention. Not nessesarily to world events and what is being splattered on TV and media screens but, especially we must be paying attention to the details of the small things being presented to us in our own lives each and every day.
We must also have a strong sense of every action we take. And I mean everything, how we buy, where we buy and who we buy from.
The real war going on right now is for our attention. Everytime we reach for a smart device someone is making a point of contact, someone is detailing and recording our every move, our every click and mapping our trends and behaviours, predicting our next move and trying to predict what we want to do next on our behalf.
This whole time we are giving up our privacy and simultaneously we are being told how much the people who are tracking us, care very much about our privacy.
Another pervasive thing has happened. It's what I call the "update and terms and conditions trap". Have you noticed that we spend a great deal of time on our phones doing two things: 1) consenting, and 2) accepting new terms and conditions?
What is this about? Is it really that every company needs to keep up with it's legal departments need to maintain some kind of international standard for how they have to conduct their business? Is it because they really care so much about your privacy that they overburden online users with a constant barage of app update and e-mails constantly redefining their terms and conditions?
When was the last time we read the terms and conditions of what we were about to consent to? How many of us really take the time to read these things – and just what are we "legally" consenting to? It's all presented as a formality, but is it?
Why does any of this matter? What does it have to do with how global intrests are unfolding?
Well, Let me try to explain it from my persepective in this little corner of the world I live in called Italy. During my years in Italy I have noticed that Italians seem to fall in love with the sound of certain words. They love the word "pandemia", in english Pandemic and they loved to pronounce "Lockdown". It got me thinking about how it seems many things have been reduced to what they seem to be rather than what they are. Perception is everything in our modern world and there seems to be no time for truth or considered critical thinking. We've just come out of a situation where the entire world was "locked down". But what do these words like lockdown and Pandemic really mean? And how has the perception of their meaning changed this time around?
Let's go to the Cambridge dictionary definition.
Pandemic. "a disease that exists in almost all of an area or in almost all of a group of people, animals or plants".
There is no lie here. The pandemic happened in 2020 through 2023. Absolutely. Just as, by the same definition, an influenza pandemic has existed every single year between about 1900 through to 2020.
In 2020 there was a name change. It went from Influenza virus to coronavirus. By now we all know and understand that Influenza is a corona virus. But we got a technical name for the new "variant" with COVID 19. Eventually, it was shortened to COVID in successive years, dropping the 19 part. Like a rap beat, we heard the word COVID over and over until we started using it in sentences ourselves and it became a new word. Now, Influenza, a coronavirus has been successfully rebranded. It has been given a new name - COVID. Some people still say they have the flu, but they are much more afraid of the word COVID. The word COVID inspires fear and brings on thoughts of a certain death.
Lockdown, as I explained to the surprise to many of my Italian friends has always been a term used to describe a situation which only occurs in a prison. We consented to a lockdown and so, by default you also became a sort of prisoner - but a global prisoner because we could claim that we shared this prison with all of humanity. We we all locked down together, saving the world.
Collins American English dictionary defines a Lockdown as such:
1. the confining of prisoners to their cells, as following a riot or other disturbance
We have now entered a grey zone of mixing peception, pronuciation and the aggressive usage of words, which affects what people think they mean. The P sound of Pandemic or Pandemia, pronouced with urgency gives it an intesity beyond it's true menaing. The C sound in COVID gives it a nice hard intensity. , with the slightest emphasis the words, as pronouced can inspire fear. Say it outload with emphasis on the P and the C sounds and you will get what I mean. This blending of perception, meaning, half truths and pronunciation emphasis - it all leads to the way people "feel" about something. It's a grey and muddled mess. And doesn't everything seems to be grey right now, striking even to the very core of redefining gender which is and always has always been an an absolute truth.
We really need to think about why these things are the way they are and what forces are behind it and what we have become.
This brings us back to terms and conditions and to the legality of everything. I have heard some people suggest or feel we might be moving toward one global government. It certainly seems to be the case as more and more countries engage in this global groupthink. But, how could one world government actually happen in a world with sovereign nations, constitutional rights, and laws connected to persons and individual rights within society?
How could anyone get around that problem, the problem of sovregnty? How could anyone get around the problem of having every country in the world switch from being a free and sovereign place, where people and individuals gather in societies for laws according to their local customs and traditions? I mean, it is monumental, right? It's just enormous to think about how anyone could go about that.
Traditionally, it has been what many maniacal leaders have attempted and failed at in the past, rallying armies, waging war and by brute force, taking over countries and imposing a new order. We saw this as recently as 1939 in our world. In the end it didn't work, but the forces of evil never stop.
Maybe that was all just a test? Or maybe the same forces behind wanting to take over the world just never stopped trying to do what they do? Perhaps they just want to find a new and gentler way of doing it?
Anyway I seem to look at the way things are unfolding, it feels diabolical.
First, why must there be one force or set of people taking over the entire world? Where does this sense of wanting to control all people come from? Why are local leaders lining up like rank and file bureaucrats to follow the leader, and very much more importantly WHO is this leader they are following? It was so easy for them to do with global lockdowns, but what is stopping them from making, for example, climate change, the next great threat to humanity?
This has lead me to thinking more about the past and more about monarchies. I have been thinking a lot about Monarchs lately. I've never fancied myself a monarchist and like most, I have always been taught about how awful and outdated monarchies are, how they seem to be guilty of what many would say the globalist forces are guilty of these days which is that a King or Queen really only wants supreme power and to have subjects under their control.
But the thing about Kings and Queens is that they ruled different places, ruled locally and dealt with local problems. Some also had much more sense of responsibility and felt the weight of their birthright. The other thing about Kings and Queens is that everyone knew exactly who they were. They were visible and actual leaders and very often they had a connection to Christ through their coronation. This seems very different to our times where leaders in many countries seem to be taking orders from somewhere, they are all in agreement, but there is no what I would call, visible leadership behind this.
So either there is; 1) no leader and they all just follow each other or 2) an higher level of leadership most people have not seen, do not understand and do not know about.
This is a bit scary to think about as I write this because, as we have witnessed it renders local laws, rights and constitutions completely and totally useless. It seems individual countries are not operating under any form of local governance and the laws which protect leaders and get them elected, but under some other governance unbeknownst to the populations who have elected them.
Armies have been replaced with microphones and cameras. Television, newspapers and media have been replaced with smartphones and that smartphone is pretty much connected to, if not completely in control of, every aspect of your life.Using these technologies our leaders are marching us straight into a global order.
So how do all these local rights get usurped? I believe it is within the law, it's all heppening "legally" but quite sneaky, for lack of an eviler term. In Europe for example, in the name of privacy, the online browsing experience has become an utter and total roadblock. It is impossible to click on a website and not be faced with a question of whether to accept or reject a cookie. (who hates cookies, right?) How harmless can a cookie be? (remember, watch the language!).
Well, most people have clicked to arrive at a website and WANT to see the information they have clicked to see. Most people are not inclined to REJECT something, but that means we end up automatically accepting other things, and those other things that we are agreeing too may just very well be something we do not want. What exactly are we accepting? Again, in the case of cookies, I do not think this is an exercise in defending your online rights, I think its a way to wear people out and get us accepting "terms and conditions" on a constant basis.
Today, do yourself a favour and count how many times you click an accept button, count how many times you accept the new terms and conditions of an app, count the number of times in a week you are asked to "update your settings", update your apps, and on and on and on.
We all being trained to be acceptors! It's getting to the point that no matter what is placed before us, we will eventually loose our sense of reason or critical choice, or worse, informed choice, in order to habitually be perpetual acceptors. Where and how does this end?
Has anyone noticed how many nations, including Italy, a once Christian nation, have quietly installed euthanasia laws? How would your great grandparents or grandparents have looked upon these laws? In most countries, these requests to "end one's own life humainly"" are being fulfilled simply by receiving a lethal injection. Now ask yourself this question. How much media time has been spent in the last four years encouraging people to be injected? Are they directly related? It does make me think a little bit.
The present culture is built on total narcism and what matters most is how you can be influenced. The influencer, your new trusted friend, has something to sell you, be it products or ideas, masked as products. The question to ask here is; Why the need to sell so hard? Everywhere you turn you are pinged, beeped, rung, poked, tweeted, messaged and distracted. Why all the distractions? Is it because the distracted person is less likely to think straight and react without thinking, or becomes exhausted convieniently gradually over time. Ready to accept anything as a mere formality.
Soon, we may find out that the terms and conditions of our AI and online world have lead us straight into an "agreed-to-because-YOU-clicked" new world with no soveriegn nations and a global groupthink world with one supreme leader. all of this leads to many questions, one's that we need to sift through and answer.
Yes, I know that I am asking a lot of questions because many questions have not been answered or I have seen in a once democratic world the people asking questions were not beaten to a pulp literally or figuratively in the online cancel culture.
All I really want to point out with what I have written here is to "WATCH THOSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS" and EXACTLY what you are agreeing to. At least think about it for more than one second.
But more than anything all we can really do is unite ourselves under God and not around these earthly things. The promises being proposed right now are fleeting.
Stay Holy.
The Way is Love.